NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Reyes [2005] NSWCCA 218
HEARING DATE(S): 12 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Wood CJ at CL at 1; Grove J at 2; Hoeben J at 98
DECISION: Crown appeal allowed.; Respondent resentenced.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SENTENCE - MULTIPLE SEXUAL AND ASSOCIATED OFFENCES ON TWO VICTIMS - HIGH LEVEL OF CRIMINALITY DISCLOSED - FAILURE TO ADVERT TO PRESCRIBED STANDARD NON PAROLE PERIOD - REFUSAL OF OFFENDER TO ACKNOWLEDGE GUILT WITH POSSIBLE EFFECT ON GRANT OF PAROLE NOT A BASIS FOR MITIGATION OF ASSESSED SENTENCE - CROWN APPEAL - INADEQUACY OF SENTENCES DEMONSTRATED - RESPONDENT RESENTENCED
Crimes Act 1900 s5D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Dinsdale v The Queen 2000 202 CLR 321 Ibbs v The Queen 1987 163 CLR 447 Pearce v The Queen 1998 194 CLR 610 R v Allpass 1993 72 A Crim R 561 CASES CITED: R v Bulut [2004] NSWCCA 325 R v Gabriel, unrep, NSWCCA 18 November 1994 R v Holder and Johnston 1983 3 NSWLR 245 R v Pellew [2004] NSWCCA 434 R v Way 2004 60 NSWLR 168
PARTIES: Regina v Mark Anthony Reyes
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/217
P. Barrett (Crown/Applicant) COUNSEL: A. Haesler SC (Respondent)
S. Kavanagh (DPP) SOLICITORS: S.E. O'Connor (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/21/3303
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Maguire DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate