NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Chamberlain v Ormsby t/as Ormsby Flower [2005] NSWCA 454
HEARING DATE(S): 15 September 2995
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Tobias JA at 7; Basten JA at 124
DECISION: (a) Appeal allowed; (b) Judgment and verdict for the respondent entered by his Honour Judge Finnane QC on 12 October 2004 be set aside; (c) The proceedings as between the appellant and the respondent be remitted to the District Court for a new trial with respect to both liability and damages; (d) The Cross-appeal of the respondent be dismissed with costs; (e) The costs of the first trial between the appellant and the respondent to abide the result of the new trial; (f) The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951, if otherwise qualified
CATCHWORDS: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – Contractual and tortious duties to client – Retainer properly to advise client – Whether solicitor and/or barrister provided adequate and timely advice as to available claims – Whether failure to take reasonable steps to ensure client understood advice – Barristers' immunity from suit – Whether barrister's advice "connected with conduct of litigation" – Causation – Whether client suffered loss as a result of practitioner's negligence – Assessment of damages – Workers Compensation Act 1987 s 151A
Workers' Compensation Act 1987 Workers' Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 1998 LEGISLATION CITED: Workers Compensation Legislation Further Amendment Act 2001 Suitors' Fund Act 1951
Arthur J S Hall & Co v Simons [2002] 1 AC 615 Burt v Ware (Court of Appeal, 28 October 1998, unreported) D'Orta Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 79 ALJR 755 Dunn v Firth [2003] NSWCA 280 Fox v Wood (1981) 148 CLR 438 CASES CITED: Green v Berry [2001] 1 Qd R 605 Giannarelli v Wraith (1988) 165 CLR 543 Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR 434 Scott v Echegaray (1991) Aust Torts Rep 81-120 Tipper v Williams (No 2) (Court of Appeal, 6 May 1994, unreported) Valmas v Nyman (James J, 12 November 1996, unreported)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate