NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 154 A Crim R 457
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Aaron John Lee Maher Regina v Dwayne Eric Welsh Regina v Craig Vincent Lardner Regina v Ronald Priestly [2005] NSWCCA 16
HEARING DATE(S): 2 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Dunford J at 1, 66; Kirby J at 65
DECISION: Extension of time allowed. Leave to appeal granted. Appeals allowed. Applicants re-sentenced.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - prison riot - multiple offenders - different roles played by different offenders - maliciously inflict grievous bodily harm with intent - riot - head sentence and non-parole period - concurrent or cumulative sentences - parity - totality
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002, No 90
Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1998) 189 CLR 295 R v Canino [2002] NSWCCA 76 R v Close (1992) 65 A Crim R 55 CASES CITED: R v Fajka [2004] NSWCCA 166 R v Hammoud (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 R v Mailes [2004] NSWCCA 394 R v McCormack & Ors [1981] VR 104 R v Tiddy (1969) SASR 575 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
Regina v Aaron John Lee Maher Regina v Dwayne Eric Welsh PARTIES: Regina v Craig Vincent Lardner Regina v Ronald Priestly
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate