NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 56 ACSR 122
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Warton v Harris [2005] NSWSC 1168
HEARING DATE(S) : 14/11/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 November 2005
Equity Division JURISDICTION : Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - costs - where no determination on the merits - CORPORATIONS - deregistration - whether plaintiff "aggrieved" by deregistration - plaintiff was director - whether possible s.197 exposure contributes to "aggrieved" status - whether attempt to become creditor by taking assignment of debt after deregistration created "aggrieved" status
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss.197, 601AH(2)
Casali v Crisp (2001) 165 FLR 79 Danich Pty Ltd v Cenco Holdings Pty Ltd (2005) 53 ACSR 484 Re Lord as liquidator of Silverline Technologies Pty Ltd (2005) 23 ACLC 1320 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; ex parte Lai Qiu (1997) 186 CLR 622 CASES CITED : Re New Timbiqui Gold Mines Ltd [1961] Ch 319 Re Waldcourt Investment Co Pty Ltd (1986) 11 ACLR 7 Re Waterbury Nominees Pty Ltd (1986) 11 ACLR 348
Paul John Warton - Plaintiff PARTIES : Nicholas Peter Harris - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4511/05
Mr G.R. Judd, Solicitor - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr B.A.J. Coles QC/Mr P.H. Blackburn-Hart - Defendant
Judd Commercial Lawyers - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Glasheen & Quilty - Defendant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate