NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
Prestige Residential Marketing Pty Limited v A & M Short Investments Pty Limited & Anor [2005] NSWSC 485 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 20 May 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 27 May 2005
Common Law Division JURISDICTION : Administrative Law List
JUDGMENT OF : at 1
DECISION : The summons is dismissed; the plaintiff is to pay the costs of the summons.
CATCHWORDS : Monetary jurisdiction of the Tribunal - limitation applies to orders - need for amendment of regulation 6 - statutory constitution and implicit amendment.
Consumer Claims Act 1998, s14 Consumer Claims Regulation 1999, reg 6 LEGISLATION CITED : Property, Stock & Business Agents Act 1941, s42A Property, Stock & Business Agents Act 2002, s36
Prestige Residential Marketing Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : A & M Short Investments Pty Limited (First Defendant) Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30036/05
Mr J T Johnson (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr M A Bradford (First Defendant)
Macedone Christie Willis (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Elliott Tuthill (First Defendant) I V Knight Crown Solicitor (Second Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of NSW
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : COM 04/40040
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Member J Smith
- 6 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate