NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Elcom Collieries Pty Ltd v Comserv Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1083
HEARING DATE(S) : 17/10/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 October 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
DECISION : Declarations that deed not terminated and it and the determination are binding on the parties.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS - General Contractual Principles - Construction and Interpretation of Contracts - Whether Deed for Expert Determination by Neutral Expert, binding on the parties was terminated before the neutral expert's determination issued - No matters of principle
Elcom Collieries Pty Ltd - Plaintiff PARTIES : Comserv Pty Ltd - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4045/05
Mr I V Gyles - For the Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mrs Axford - Defendant in Person
SOLICITORS : Clayton Utz Lawyers
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
GZELL J
WEDNESDAY 26 OCTOBER 2005
4045/05 ELCOM COLLIERIES PTY LTD v COMSERV (NO 1727) PTY LTD JUDGMENT
The issue 1 Comserve (No 1727) Pty Ltd is the owner of commercial premises containing three shops at Chain Valley Bay in New South Wales. Comserv brought proceedings in the District Court against Elcom Collieries Pty Ltd claiming damages for the effects of subsidence upon its building, allegedly caused by underground mining operations carried on by Elcom. 2 Consequent upon an order of the District Court that the parties participate in a process of alternative dispute resolution, a deed for expert determination by a neutral expert was executed by Comserve, Elcom and Geoffrey Andrew Markham, the neutral expert. 3 Mr Markham delivered his determination to the solicitors for Comserv on 15 March 2005. The issue is whether Comserv had, prior to that event, terminated the deed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate