NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision :
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Douar v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 455
HEARING DATE(S): 17 October 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Adams J at 2; Johnson J at 3
DECISION: 1. Time extended to 22 June 2005 to file Notice of Intention to Apply for Leave to Appeal; 2. Leave to appeal is granted, appeal allowed and sentence imposed in District Court on 24 April 2003 quashed; 3. Pursuant to s.12(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912, matter remitted to District Court for resentencing in accordance with this judgment; 4. Question of the Applicant's bail pending his appearance in the District Court may be determined by a single judge.
CATCHWORDS: SENTENCING - application for extension of time - appeal against severity of sentence - supply prohibited drug - periodic detention - need to fix term of sentence before considering alternatives to full-time custody - error established - application of test under section 6(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 by Court of Criminal Appeal - whether Court to apply test by reference to events at time of sentence in the District Court or at time of hearing by Court of Criminal Appeal - nature of section 6(3) test - section 6(3) test satisfied - sentence quashed - matter remitted under section 12(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 to District Court for resentencing.
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Periodic Detention of Prisoners Act 1981 Interpretation Act 1987
R v Young [1999] NSWCCA 275 R v Beattie [2000] NSWCCA 201 R v Munday (1981) 2 NSWLR 177 R v Goodwin (1990) 51 A Crim R 328 R v Many (1990) 51 A Crim R 54 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Willard (2001) 120 A Crim R 450 R v Wegener [1999] NSWCCA 405 R v Foster [2001] NSWCCA 215 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v Hanslow [2002] NSWCCA 161 R v Schodde (2003) 142 A Crim R 307 R v Sadebath (1992) 16 MVR 138 R v Bang (Court of Criminal Appeal, 1 September 1992, unreported) R v Saldaneri [2001] NSWCCA 480 R v Strahan [2003] NSWCCA 397 AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v AB (No. 2) (2000) 117 A Crim R 473 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 R v Ryan (No. 2) [2003] NSWCCA 35 R v De Luca [2002] NSWCCA 446 R v Sweetman [2000] NSWCCA 228 R v Eagleton [2003] NSWCCA 40 R v Chew [2004] NSWCCA 132 R v Marchando [2003] NSWCCA 71 CASES CITED: R v Johnson [2003] NSWCCA 129 R v Scott [2003] NSWCCA 28 R v MJM [2004] NSWCCA 66 R v M [2005] NSWCCA 224 R v Johnson [2005] NSWCCA 186 R v Astill (No. 2) (1992) 64 A Crim R 289 R v Oastler (Court of Criminal Appeal, 7 October 1992, BC9203282) R v Cocking [1999] NSWCCA 311 R v Mai (1992) 26 NSWLR 371 R v Price [2005] NSWCCA 285 R v Araya and Joannes (1992) 63 A Crim R 123 R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Scullion (Court of Criminal Appeal, 15 July 1992, unreported, BC9203142) Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 R v Burke [2002] NSWCCA 353 Charara v Director of Public Prosecutions (2001) 120 A Crim R 225 R v Mehajer and Jacobs [2003] NSWSC 885 R v Ha [2004] NSWCCA 386 R v Nasr [2004] NSWCCA 441 R v CBK [2002] NSWCCA 457 R v Tirtabudi [2004] NSWCCA 328 R v Walker [2005] NSWCCA 109 R v McLean (2001) 121 A Crim R 484 R v Bloomfield (1998) 44 NSWLR 734 R v Cooney [2004] NSWCCA 255
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate