NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ASIC v Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWSC 491 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 and 3 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 June 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J DECISION : Notice held valid; Defendants to pay costs of application on indemnity basis.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - EVIDENCE - INDEMNITY COSTS - Notice under s.79(1) ASIC Act - meaning of "specified statements" - how they may be identified - whether Notice under s.79(1) needs to be signed - whether indemnity costs should be ordered where unsuccessful party has advanced a case without merit and with no reputable argument to support it. - Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) - s.5, s.19, s.76(3), s.79(1) LEGISLATION CITED : - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Part 3 Div 9, s.206E, s.461(1), s.1317H, s.1324(10) - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - s.167C, s.169(1) Plaintiff: Australian Securities & Investments Commission First Defendant: Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd Second Defendant: Dennis Ralph Anthony Third Defendant: Martin Lloyd Cocks Fourth Defendant: Dominic Luvara Fifth Defendant: Peter Victor Topperwien Sixth Defendant: Bud Shaheen Seventh Defendant: Australian Capital Forum Pty Ltd Eighth Defendant: Medionics Pty Ltd Ninth Defendant: Sage Global Fund Ltd Tenth Defendant: Techlogica Pty Ltd Eleventh Defendant: Suisse Credit Pty Ltd Twelfth Defendant: Swiss Pacific Inc Thirteenth Defendant: Nominee Securities Pty Ltd PARTIES : Fourteenth Defendant: Finance Projects Pty Ltd Fifteenth Defendant: Money Mint Pty Ltd Sixteenth Defendant: Casabanca Pty Ltd Seventeenth Defendant: Business Franchises Pty Ltd Eighteenth Defendant: Webfeatures Pty Ltd Nineteenth Defendant: Sacvere Pty Ltd Twentieth Defendant: Associated Asset Management Twenty-first Defendant: IT Genius Pty Ltd Twenty-second Defendant: Moneytec Investment Management Ltd Twenty-third Defendant: Metrobank Pty Ltd Twenty-fourth Defendant: Australian Equity Forum Pty Ltd Twenty-fifth Defendant: Tax Law Accounting Pty Ltd Twenty-sixth Defendant: Tax Law Accounting Partnership Pty Ltd Twenty-seventh Defendant: Biotech Securities Ltd Twenty-eighth Defendant: Arbitrage Trading Pty Ltd Twenty-ninth Defendants: Whitton & Lombe FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5164/01 COUNSEL : D.R. Stack - Plaintiff J.T. Johnson - 5th, 22nd and 28th Defendants SOLICITORS : Australian Securities & Investments Commission - Plaintiff Anderson Lawyers - 5th, 22nd and 28th Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate