NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
Re Estate Late Hazel Ruby Grounds; Page v Sedawie [2005] NSWSC 1311 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 17 October 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 December 2005
Equity JURISDICTION : Probate List
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
DECISION : Costs of both parties out of estate
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION – Wills, probate and administration – costs of probate action when all questions in probate settled except costs – costs of a part of litigation in which parties contest validity of two wills both of which parties eventually accept are invalid – factors influencing costs in probate actions – importance of role of a party, as being plaintiff or defendant, in assessing costs in probate actions
In the Estate of Osment; Child v Osment [1914] P 129 Headington v Holloway (1830) 3 Hag Ecc 280 Harrington v Butt [1905] P 3 n CASES CITED : In the Estate of Hodges; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Perpetual Trustee v Baker [1999] NSWCA 244 Shorten v Shorten (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 60
Clarence Page - First Plaintiff Fay Page - Second Plaintiff Noel Phillip Sedawie - First Defendant PARTIES : Susan Gail Wilson - Second Defendant Mavis Robertson by her tutor Dale Forsythe Robertson - Third Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 118153/01
J E Armfield - Plaintiffs COUNSEL : M S Willmott SC - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate