NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: REGINA v. PITT [2005] NSWCCA 304
HEARING DATE(S): Tuesday 28 June 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Hoeben J at 6; Hall J at 7
DECISION: (a) Leave to appeal granted; (b) Appeal allowed and the sentence imposed by the District Court be quashed; (c) In lieu thereof, sentence the applicant to terms of imprisonment as follows: Count 1: On the offence of malicious wounding, the applicant is sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of two years, to date from 17 July 2003, to expire on 16 July 2005. In respect of that sentence, a non-parole period is not appropriate, having regard to the structure of the sentences to be involved in respect of the armed robbery offences; Count 2: In respect of the first count of armed robbery with a dangerous weapon, a sentence of three years and six months to date from 17 January 2004, to expire on 16 July 2007. In respect of that sentence, there is a non-parole period of two years to date from 17 January 2004 and to expire on 16 January 2006; Count 3: In respect of the second count of armed robbery with a dangerous weapon, a sentence is imposed of five years to commence on 17 July 2004 and to expire on 16 July 2009. In respect of that sentence, there is a non-parole period of two years to date from 17 July 2004 and to expire on 16 July 2006; Count 4: Possess unauthorised firearm and Count 5: possess unregistered firearm, a sentence of imprisonment for a fixed term of one year, commencing on 17 July 2003 and expiring on 16 July 2004.; In accordance with the orders proposed, the appellant will be eligible to be released on parole upon the expiry of the non-parole period specified on 16 July 2006.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentence - mental disorder - knowledge of the gravity of actions - insufficient regard to applicant's history of mental illness - less weight given to general deterrence - altered mental state - impairment of both judgment and volitional control - drug abuse - mental disorder is causally related to commission of offences - diminution of sentence having regard to applicant's mental condition - mental condition may increase importance of deterrence of offender - alcohol, valium and other medications consumed prior to offences - applicant did not possess a full understanding of the authority and requirements of the law
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate