NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : MPM Constructions Pty Limited v Michael Triguboff & Anor [2004] NSWSC 764 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/07/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 August 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Technology and Construction List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : [see paragraph 22]
CATCHWORDS : Costs MPM Constructions Pty Limited ACN 003 910 601 (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Micahel Triguboff (First Defendant) Eleanora Triguboff (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55024/02 COUNSEL : Mr T Lynch, Ms Dolenec (Plaintiff) Mr G Watson SC, Ms T Wong (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Snelgroves (Plaintiff) MasseyBailey (Defendants)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION LIST
Einstein J
Thusday 26 August 2004
55024/02 MPM CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LIMITED v MICHAEL TRIGUBOFF & ANOR JUDGMENT Costs 1 Both parties have furnished written submissions in relation to costs of the proceedings. 2 The material background to the costs determination and the reasons for making the usual order are given in the plaintiff's submissions which are presently adopted in this regard. 3 The plaintiff sued: (a) alleging repudiation of the contract by the defendants, and
(b) claiming damages for: (i) the amount of P/Claim 11 $110,561.84
(ii) the amount of P/Claim 12 $292,313.98
(iii) non return of retention moneys $120,231.97
(iv) loss of profits of $330,000.00
(v) miscellaneous other heads $60,000.00 $913,107.79
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate