NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v HOUSE [2005] NSWCCA 88
HEARING DATE(S): 17 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 31, 33; Wood CJ at CL at 1; Buddin J at 32
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - appeal against sentence - plea of guilty - armed robbery - whether sentencing judge erred in finding aggravating factors - whether weight given by sentencing judge to community expectations and prevalence of armed robbery offences - whether sentence imposed unduly severe.
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Application by the Attorney General Under s 37 (Sentencing Procedure) Act by the Attorney General for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under s 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No 3 of 2002) [2004] NSWCCA 303 R v Bloomfield NSWCCA 15 July 1998 R v Broxham NSWCCA 3 April 1986 R v Downie and Dandy [1998] 2 VR 517 R v H (1980) 3 A Crim R 53 R v Hayes (1983) 11 A Crim R 187 CASES CITED: R v Henry [1999] 46 NSWLR 346 R v Perrett [1999] NSWCCA 115 R v Petrinovic NSWCCA 18 September 1990 R v Sharma (2002) 130 A Crim R 238 R v Spiero (1979) 22 SASR 543 R v Stefanovski NSWCCA 9 June 1994 R v Underhill 9 May 1986
Regina PARTIES: David Gary House
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3221
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate