NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Newham [2005] NSWCCA 325
HEARING DATE(S): 12 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 12 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 36; Grove J at 1; Buddin J at 37
DECISION: APPEAL ALLOWED; APPELLANT RESENTENCED
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SENTENCE - SPECIFICALLY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT FACTORS OF ADDITIONAL AGGRAVATION WHICH ARE INGREDIENTS OF OFFENCE - SURROUNDING CIRCUMSTANCE ELEVATING OFFENCE INTO MORE SERIOUS CATEGORY THAN THAT CHARGED - CROWN CONCESSIONS - RESENTENCE APPROPRIATE
s 61L Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: s 21A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 6(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912
R v Blair [2005] NSWCCA 78 R v Di Simoni 1981 147 CLR 383 R v Solomon [2005] NSWCCA 158 CASES CITED: R v Street [2005] NSWCCA 139 R v Tadrosse [2005] NSWCCA 145 R v Tzanis [2005] NSWCCA 274 R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412
PARTIES: Regina v Wade Robert Newham
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1086
P. Ingram (Crown) COUNSEL: H. Dhanji (Applicant)
S. Kavanagh (DPP) SOLICITORS: S. O'Connor (Applicant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/31/0360
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Coolahan DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/1086
MASON ACJ GROVE J BUDDIN J
12 September 2005 REGINA v WADE ROBERT NEWHAM Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate