NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tuta Healthcare v Nipro Asia [2005] NSWSC 664
HEARING DATE(S) : 1 July 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 1 July 2005
Equity JURISDICTION : Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
DECISION : Evidence not allowed. Amendment not allowed.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - setting aside - allowable evidence - allowable amendments to application
Chadah Pty Limited v Kubota Tractor Australia Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 456 Elm Financial Services Pty Limited v MacDougal [2004] NSWSC 560 Energy Equity Corporation Limited v Sinedie Pty Limited (2001) 166 FLR 179 Financial Solutions Australasia Pty Limited v Predella Pty Limited (2002) 167 FLR 106 Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas and Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund (1996) 21 ACSR 581 CASES CITED : Meadowfield Pty Limited v Gold Coast Holdings Pty Limited [2001] WASCA 360 POS Media Online Limited v B Family Pty Limited (2003) 21 ACLC 533; [2003] NSWSC 147 Process Machinery Australia Pty Limited v ACN 057260590 Pty Limited [2002] NSWSC 45 Scope Data Systems v BDO Nelson Parkhill (2003) 199 ALR 56; [2003] NSWSC 137 Tokich Holdings Pty Limited v Sheraton Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited (2004) 185 FLR 130; [2004] NSWSC 527 Topfelt Pty Limited v State Bank of New South Wales Ltd (1993) 12 ACSR 381
Tuta Healthcare Pty Limited - Plaintiff PARTIES : Nipro Asia Pty Limited - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5244/04
R K Eassie - Plaintiff COUNSEL : M J Dawson - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate