NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Lahoud & Ors. v. Lahoud & Anor. [2006] NSWCA 169
HEARING DATE(S): 27 and 28 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 30 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 5; Ipp JA at 113
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACT - Appeal - Primary judge not satisfied that oral promises or representations made as conditions for entry into a written agreement - Whether factual errors shown.
Hoyts Pty. Limited v. Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133 CASES CITED: Stockland (Constructors) Pty. Limited v. Retail Design Group (International) Pty. Limited [2003] NSWCA 84 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Watson v. Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315
Victor Lahoud - 1st appellant Castle Constructions Pty. Ltd. - 2nd appellant PARTIES: Solidare Pty. Ltd. - 3rd appellant Joseph Lahoud - 1st respondent Joseph Lahoud & Associates Pty. Ltd. - 2nd respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40528/05
COUNSEL: Mr. J.T. Gleeson SC with Mr. P. Kulevski for appellants Mr. S.D. Epstein SC with Mr. T. Maltz for respondents
SOLICITORS: Aitken McLachlan Thorpe for appellants Baron & Associates for respondents
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC3606/01 SC2530/04
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Palmer J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 30 May 2005
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2005] NSWSC 509
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA40528/05 SC 3606/01 SC 2530/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate