NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Isis Projects v Clarence Street [2004] NSWSC 714 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 August 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Technology and Construction List JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J DECISION : See paras [68] and [69] of judgment
CATCHWORDS : BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) - where defendant paid part of one progress claim and none of another - whether plaintiff entitled to recover amounts unpaid as a debt - where progress claims identified work by single line item references - whether progress claims identified the construction work to which they related - requirement in s 13(2)(a) that a payment claim identify the construction work to which the payment relates - where defendant did not object to form of payment claim on eleven prior occasions - where contractual clause requiring payment claim to be suported by evidence - whether progress claims suported by sufficient evidence - where defendant had not provided payment schedule or paid whole or part of claimed amount by due date - application of s 15(4)(b)(ii). LEGISLATION CITED : Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Amendment Act 2002 (NSW) Parist Holdings Pty Ltd v W T Partnership Australia Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 365 Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Campbelltown Catholic Club Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1103 Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd v Luikens & Anor [2003] NSWSC 1140 Jemzone v Trytan [2002] NSWSC 395 CASES CITED : Walter Construction Group Ltd v CPL (Surry Hills) Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 266 Hawkins Construction (Aust) Pty Ltd v Mac's Industrial Pipework Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 136 Isis v Clarence [2004] NSWSC 73 Isis Projects Pty Ltd v Clarence Street Ltd [2004] NSWSC 222 Consolidated Constructions Pty Ltd v Ettamogah Pub [2004] NSWSC 110 PARTIES : Isis Projects Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Clarence Street Pty Ltd (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55032/03 COUNSEL : R J Powell SC/ M R Elliott (Plaintiff) F C Corsaro SC/ M H Southwick (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Turtons Lawyers (Plaintiff) Watson Mangioni (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate