NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 152 A Crim R 100
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
R v BURGESS; R v SAUNDERS [2005] NSWCCA 52 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 29 July 2004
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Adams J at 1; Hislop J at 51; Newman AJ at 52
DECISION: Appeals against conviction dismissed ; leave to appeal against sentences granted ; appeals dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CONVICTION APPEAL - defence of another - damage to property of innocent third party - distinction between protest and self-defence - role of judge - whether defence rightly excluded - appeal dismissed - SENTENCE APPEAL - significance of payment of compensation - appeal dismissed
Crimes Act 1900 ss194, 195(a), 418, 422 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s5F LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s44(1) International Criminal Court Act 2002 Model Criminal Code
Jones and Milling & Ors v Gloucestershire Crown Prosecution Service [2004] EWCA Crim 1981 Packett v The Queen (1937) 58 CLR 191 Palmer v The Queen [1978] AC 814 R v Cinous [2002] 2 SCR 3, 2002 SCC 29 R v Howe (1958) 100 CLR 448 R v Katarzynski [2002] NSWSC 613 CASES CITED: R v Marshall (unreported, NSWCCA 17 July 1990) R v Muratovic (1967) Qd R 15 R v Phillips and Pringle (1973) 1 NSWLR 275 R v PRFN (unreported, NSWCCA 21 June 2000) Rogers (1996) 86 A Crim R 542 Viro v The Queen (1978) 141 CLR 88 Zecevic v DPP (Victoria) (1987) 162 CLR 645
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate