NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : State of New South Wales v Austeel Pty Limited [2004] NSWSC 81 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 February 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 February 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Technology & Construction List JUDGMENT OF : Bergin J DECISION : Extension granted
CATCHWORDS : Application pursuant to s.48 of the Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (NSW) by plaintiff (respondent in arbitration) to extend certain times in arbitration clause in Agreement with defendant (claimant in arbitration) - Whether application involves the determinaion of a question of law - "undue hardship"- Whether in all the circumstances time should be extended. LEGISLATION CITED : Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 Haskins & Anor v Brae - Villa Homes Pty Ltd VSC, O'Bryan J 27 July 1995 Jennings v Credit Corp Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 48 NSWLR 709 Liberian Shipping Corporation v A. King & Sons Ltd [1967] 1 Lloyd's Rep 302 CASES CITED : PMT Partners Pty Ltd v Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service (1995) 184 CLR 301 State of New South Wales v Austeel Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 1077 State of New South Wales v Austeel Pty Limited [2003] NSWCA 392 Raguz v Sullivan (2000) 50 NSWLR 236 White v Overland and Anor [2001] FCA 1333 PARTIES : State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Austeel Pty Ltd (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55010/04 COUNSEL : Mr J Sackar QC (Plaintiff) Mr M Holmes QC (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Freehills (Plaintiff) Kemp Strang (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate