NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) DFC 95-328
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Burgess v. King [2005] NSWCA 396
HEARING DATE(S): 2 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Campbell AJA at 37
DECISION: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Orders below varied by substituting for the figure of $65,000.00 the figure of $115,000.00. 3. Appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings at first instance on a party and party basis. 4. Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal, and to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act if otherwise eligible.
CATCHWORDS: FAMILY LAW - De facto relationships - Statutory power to make orders adjusting property interests of parties - Matters to be considered - Large capital gain in matrimonial home owned by respondent - Respondent able to keep home because of contributions by appellant of about one-quarter its value - Whether primary judge should have considered whether the appellant should have some benefit from this capital gain - Extent of appellate intervention.
LEGISLATION CITED: Property (Relationships) Act 1984 s.20
Raymond Peter Burgess - appellant PARTIES: Sandra Elizabeth King - respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40260/05
Mr. R. Maurice for appellant COUNSEL: Mr. J. Levy for respondent
Heazlewoods Bushby International, Epping for appellant SOLICITORS: Thurlow Fisher, Bankstown for respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC1635/04
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Young CJ in Eq.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40260/05 SC 1635/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate