NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Van Eden v Van Eden Shoes Australia P/L [2005] NSWSC 282
HEARING DATE(S) : 24 November 2004, 1 February 2005 & 17 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 7 April 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
DECISION : (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) The orders of Magistrate Morahan dated 30 August 2002 are affirmed; (3) The summons filed 26 September 2002 is dismissed; (4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal from decision of Local Court Magistrate - procedural fairness
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - ss 180, 181 & 182 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) - s 14 LEGISLATION CITED : Local Courts (Civil Claims) Act 1970 (NSW) - s 69 Local Court (Civil Claims) Rules 1988 (NSW) - Pt 6 r 3(1)
Allen v Kerr & Anor (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-354 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Carr v Neill [1999] NSWSC1263 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 CASES CITED : Kojima Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Chinese Newspapers Pty Ltd [200] NSWSC 1153 RL & D Investments Pty Ltd v Bisby [2002] NSWSC 1082 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Construcitons Pty Ltd (in Liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588 Wakim v Mathiew Pty Ltd t/as Dove Migration Services [2002] NSWSC 405
Franciscus Maria Van Eden (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Van Eden Shoes Australia Pty Limited (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12683/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate