NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Director General, Department of Education and Training v MT (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 320
HEARING DATE(S): On the papers
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Ipp JA at 20; Hunt AJA at 21
DECISION: 1 The order as to costs should not be varied; 2 Add a new order ; "5 The Respondent to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if otherwise entitled".
CATCHWORDS: COSTS – Costs of appeal – Application by unsuccessful respondent that each party pay its own costs – Costs to follow the event
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997: ss 88(1), 119 LEGISLATION CITED: Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998: ss 12(c), 17, 18, 19 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005: rr 36.17, 42.1
CASES CITED: CSR Limited v Eddy [2005] HCA 64; 80 ALJR 59 Director General, Department of Education & Training MT [2006] NSWCA 270
PARTIES: Director General, Department of Education and Training (Appellant) MT (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40043 of 2006
COUNSEL: N Perram SC (Appellant) S Pritchard (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: IV Knight – Crown Solicitor (Appellant) Public Interest Advocacy Centre (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): ADT 049040 and 049045
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Judge KP O'Connor, S Higgins, Z Antonios
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2005] NSWADTAP 77
- 1 - THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40043/06
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate