NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 61 NSWLR 1
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : [1] Mills v Ruthol Pty Ltd; [2] Tricon v Ruthol [2004] NSWSC 547 HEARING DATE(S) : 10 June, 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 June 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J DECISION : Equitable damages available; assessment date is date of orders of Court of Appeal.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITABLE DAMAGES - Whether available - whether plaintiffs must have right to specific performance or injunction as at commencement of suit - principles discussed - whether damages to be assessed as at date of judgment or otherwise. Lord Cairns' Act, 1858 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) - s.68 Supreme Court Act 1958 (Vic) - s.62 Supreme Court Rules - Pt 31 - ASA Constructions Pty Ltd v Iwanov [1975] 1 NSWLR 512 - Bosaid v Andry [1963] VR 465 - Boyns v Lackey (1958) 58 SR(NSW) 395 - Davenport v Rylands (1865) LR 1 Eq 302 - Ferguson v Wilson (1866) 2 Ch App 77 - Hasham v Zenab [1960] AC 316 - Hilton v Tipper (1868) 18 LT 626 - Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269 - Lavery v Pursell (1888) 39 Ch D 508 - Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Company (1880) 5 AC 25 CASES CITED : - Mills v Ruthol Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 294 - The Millstream Pty Ltd v Schultz [1980] 1 NSWLR 547 - Oakacre Ltd v Claire Cleaners (Holdings) Ltd [1982] Ch 197 - Phelps v Prothero (1855) 7 De GM&G 722; 44 ER 280 - Price v Strange [1978] Ch 337 - Rosser v Maritime Services Board (No 2) (unrep.) NSWSC, 17 September 1996 - Ruthol Pty Ltd v Mills [2003] NSWCA 56 - White v Boby (1877) 37 LT 652 - Wroth v Tyler [1974] Ch 30 - "Equitable Damages" McDermott, 1994, at p.82 - "Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity Doctrines & Remedies" 4th Ed., R.P. Meagher, D. Haydon, M. Leeming, para. 23-050 - "The Principles of Equitable Remedies" Dr I.C.F. Spry QC, 6th Ed. 2001, at 632 [1] First Plaintiff - Brian Mills [1] Second Plaintiff - Elaine Mills [1] Defendant - Ruthol Pty Ltd PARTIES : [2] Plaintiff - Tricon (Aust) Pty Ltd [2] First Defendant - Ruthol Pty Ltd [2] Second Defendant - Brian Mills [2]Third Defendant - Elaine Mills FILE NUMBER(S) : SC [1] 2101/99; [2] 4858/01 [1] Plaintiffs - N.A. Cotman SC [1] Defendant - R.S. Angyal, K. Andronos COUNSEL : [2] Plaintiff - No appearance [2] First Defendant - R.S. Angyal, K. Andronos [2] Second & Third Defendants - N.A. Cotman SC [1] Plaintiffs - McCabe Terrill [1] Defendant - David Landa Stewart SOLICITORS : [2] Plaintiff - No appearance [2] First Defendant - David Landa Stewart [2] Second & Third Defendants - McCabe Terrill
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate