NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 154 A Crim R 183
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Regina v Tamilo ATONIO [2005] NSWCCA 200 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 24/03/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Hislop J at 4; Hall J at 53
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Aggravating factors Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 21A - Utilitarian value of plea.
Crimes Act 1900 - s 95(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 21A(1) - (3)
Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 R v Matthews (2004) 145 A Crim R 445 R v Scott [2003] NSWCCA 286 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 235 CASES CITED: R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386 R v Thomson (1999-2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 R v Williams [2005] NSWCCA 99 Whittaker v The King (1928) 41 CLR 230
Appellant - Tamilo Atonio PARTIES: Respondent - Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3049 CCAP
Mr A Haesler SC with Mr S Jeppesen - Appellant COUNSEL: Mr W Dawe QC - Respondent
SE O'Connor (Legal Aid Commission NSW) - Appellant SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh (Director of Public Prosecutions NSW) - Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate