NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 64 NSWLR 101 (2006) NSW ConvR 56-149
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ferella v Otvosi [2005] NSWSC 962
HEARING DATE(S) : 18 & 19 July, 1 & 2 August 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 23 September 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : Modification of restrictive covenant refused. Injunction to restrain development as in breach of covenant granted.
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY [432], [435], [436] - Restrictive covenants - Interpretation - General principles - Covenant that no building be erected "more than two storeys in height" - Meaning - Whether uncertain for ambiguity - Rule to be applied to resolve ambiguity - Proceedings to extinguish, modify or discharge restriction - Restriction obsolete - Meaning of obsolete - No substantial injury to person entitled - Meaning of substantial injury
Conveyancing Act 1919 s 89(1) and (2) LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 s 36(11) Supreme Court Rules 1970 Part 40 r 8
Associated Alloys Pty Ltd v ACN 001 452 106 Pty Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 588 Biotechnology Australia Pty Ltd v Pace (1988) 15 NSWLR 130 Cavacourt Pty Ltd v Durian (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1998) 9 BPR 16,833 Clark v Wodehouse 669 P2d 170 (1983) Doe d Abdy v Stevens (1832) 3 B & Ad 299; 110 ER 112 Druitts Developments Pty Ltd v Gosford City Council (2001) 114 LGERA 61 Durian (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Cavacourt Pty Ltd (2000) 10 BPR 18,099 Elliston v Reacher [1908] 2 Ch 374 Ex parte High Standard Constructions Ltd (1928) 29 SR (NSW) 274 Ferella v Otvosi [2003] NSWSC 1254 Ferella v Otvosi [2004] NSWSC 230 Ferella v Otvosi [2005] NSWSC 678 Fong v Hashimoto 92 Hawai'i 568; 994 P2d 500 (2000) Fowle v Welsh (1822) 1 B & C 29; 107 ER 12 Hiner v Hoffman 90 Hawai'i 188; 977 P2d 878 (1999) Hughes v ACT Planning and Land Authority (2004) 136 LGERA 420 Johnson v Linton 491 SW 2d 189 (1973) Kirby v Esplin NSWSC Bryson J 26 May 1989 unreported CASES CITED : Leichhardt Municipal Council v Daniel Callaghan Pty Ltd (1981) 46 LGRA 29 Lolakis v Konitsas (2002) 11 BPR 20,499 Ludwig v Chatauqua Shores Improvement Association Inc 5 AD 3d 1119; 774 NYS 2d 240 (2004) Metius v Julio 27 Md App 491; 342 A 2d 348 (1975) Mogensen v Portuland Developments Pty Ltd (1983) NSW ConvR 55-116 NSW Sports Club Ltd v Solomon (1914) 14 SR (NSW) 340 Pebruk Nominees Pty Ltd v Woolworths (Victoria ) Pty Ltd [2003] TASSC 94 Pieper v Edwards [1982] 1 NSWLR 336 Re Mason (1960) 78 WN (NSW) 925 Re Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance; Ex parte Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 379 The Olympic Brilliance [1982] 2 Lloyds Rep 205 Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling & Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429 W & D Engineering Pty Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of Customs [2000] FCA 440 Webb v Plummer (1819) 2 B & Ald 746; 106 ER 537 Williams v James (1867) LR 2 CP 577 Bradbrook and Neave, Easements and Restrictive Covenants in Australia (2nd ed, 2000) [15.5], [15.6], [19.62] & [19.64] Lewison, The Interpretation of Contracts (2nd ed, 1997) par 7.07 Norton on Deeds (2nd ed, 1928) 549 - 550
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate