NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : BUCKLEY v. VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUND CORPORATION [2004] NSWSC 513 HEARING DATE(S) : Wednesday 9 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 June 2004 JURISDICTION: Civil JUDGMENT OF : Greg James J at 1 DECISION : Summons dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Application for declaration and certiorari - whether administrative Tribunal acted unreasonably or irrationally - nature of test - Tribunal not satisfied psychiatric or psychological disorder "severely disabling" - question of fact - refusal to so find not outside ambit of fact finding function conferred on Tribunal by the Act. LEGISLATION CITED : Victims Support & Rehabilitation Act 1996 Supreme Court Act 1970 Craig v. The State of South Australia (1994) 184 CLR 163 Collector of Customs v. Agfa-Gevaert Limited (1995-96) 186 CLR 38 Hope v. The Council of the City of Bathurst (1980) 144 CLR 1 CASES CITED : Brutus v. Cozens [1973] AC 854 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs ex parte Cohen [2001] HCA 10 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v. Rajamanikkam & Anor [2002] HCA 32 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v. Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 PARTIES : BUCKLEY, Scott Gregory v. VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUND CORPORATION FILE NUMBER(S) : SC No. 13387 of 2003 COUNSEL : Plaintiff: S. Longhurst Defendant: R. Beech-Jones SOLICITORS : Plaintiff: Russell McLelland Brown Defendant: I.V. Knight
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate