NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Martin [2005] NSWCCA 381
HEARING DATE(S): 30/09/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hislop J at 2; Rothman J at 24
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Sentencing - Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s 25(2) - Different sentences for co-offenders - Special circumstances - No error - Sentence not manifestly excessive
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 - ss 25(2), 25A
R v Doan NSWCCA, 27/9/96 (unreported) R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 R v MD [2005] NSWCCA 342 R v Nguyen [2002] NSWCCA 183 CASES CITED: R v Reid [2000] NSWCCA 166 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Steele NSWCCA, 17/4/97 (unreported) R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386 Whittaker v The King (1928) 41 CLR 230 R v X [2004] NSWCCA 93
Margaret Joan Martin - Applicant PARTIES: Regina - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1005
Mr C Waterstreet with Ms N Mikhaiel - Applicant COUNSEL: Ms N Noman - Respondent
Michael Croke & Co Solicitors - Applicant SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh (Director of Public Prosecutions) - Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/21/0281
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Blackmore SC DCJ
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/1005
McCLELLAN CJ at CL HISLOP J ROTHMAN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate