NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Milne v Haynes & 6 ors [2005] NSWSC 1107
HEARING DATE(S) : 1 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Latham J at 1
DECISION : The proceedings are dismissed.; The plaintiff's Notice of Motion is dismissed.; The plaintiff is to pay the costs on the Notices of Motion filed by each of the defendants.
CATCHWORDS : Summary dismissal - r 13.4 UCP Rules - abuse of process - re-litigation of Family Law proceedings.
Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (Clth) s 3(1)(c) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act Family Law Act
D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid and Anor [2005] HCA 12 Dragan Markisic & Anor v Middleton Lawyers & Ors [2005] NSWSC 258 R v Beydoun (1990) 22 NSWLR 256 CASES CITED : Mann v O'Neill (1997) 191 ALJR 204 in Preston v Star City Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 1273 General Steel Industries Inc. v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598
Plaintiff - Lloyd Westbrooke Milne Defendant 1 -Elizabeth Haynes Defendant 2 - Sayan & Associates Defendant 3 - Emily Carol Milne PARTIES : Defendant 4 - Amanda Gale Defendant 5 - The HSBC Bank Australia Limited Defendant 6 - The State of New South Wales Defendant 7 - The Commonwealth of Australia
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12325/2005
Plaintiff - Self Represented Defendants 1 and 2 - I Pike Defendant 3 - Ms Meredith Defendant 4 - Mr A Porthouse COUNSEL : Defendant 5 - Mr Lucarelle Defendant 6 - Mr Craddock Defendant 7 - Mr S Vorreitter
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate