NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mills v Perras [2005] NSWSC 1184
HEARING DATE(S) : 16 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 November 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Harrison
DECISION : (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) The decisions of his Honour Magistrate Gould dated 8 March 2005 and 24 March 2005 are affirmed; (3) The summons filed 7 April 2005 is dismissed; (4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of Local Court Magistrate - Dog - Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 - Justice is a german shepherd
Crimes (Local Courts Appeal and Review) Act 201 (NSW) - s 56(1)(c) LEGISLATION CITED : Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 (NSW) - s 4(1)
Allen v Kerr & Anor (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-354 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Gorczynski v Beilby [2005] NSWSC 884 Holloway v McFeeters [1956] 94 CLR 470 Housing Commission (NSW) v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (11983) 3 NSWLR 378 CASES CITED : Jung v Son [1998] NSWCA 698 (18 December 1998) Pettitt v Dunkley (1971) 1 NSWLR 376 R L & D Investments Pty Ltd v Bisby [2002] MVR 479 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (In Liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council [2005] HCA 4
Mervyn Thomas Mills (PLaintiff) PARTIES : John Perras (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate