NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: REGINA v TAE [2005] NSWCCA 29
HEARING DATE(S): 11/02/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Hidden J at 34; Bell J at 35
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed, subject to this Court holding that the sentence that would have been imposed on the applicant, but for future assistance, would have been two years five months
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - bribery of a Commonwealth public official - assistance to authorities - whether the sentencing judge erred in calculating the purported discount - whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to sentence the applicant in accordance with s21E of the Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth), having regard to the assistance - whether the sentencing judge gave adequate value to the assistance
Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Commonwealth)
Regina v El Hani [2004] NSWCCA 162 CASES CITED: Regina v Gallagher, (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 Regina v Pang (1999) 105 A Crim R 474
PARTIES: REGINA v Chung Pong TAE
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/2709
GJ Bellew - Respondent COUNSEL: GD Wendler - Applicant
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Respondent SOLICITORS: Youngs Attorneys - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/11/0261
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Nield DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/2709
JAMES J HIDDEN J BELL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate