NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 66 IPR 166
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Southern Cross Financial Group (Newcastle) Pty Ltd v Rodrigues [2005] NSWSC 621
HEARING DATE(S) : 30, 31 May 2005; 1, 2 and 3 June 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 June 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
DECISION : Proceedings dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS [4][7][9]-Brokers of insurance and financial products-Contract for sale of goodwill in part of business based on client list-Whether contract incomplete for lack of essential terms-Whether nature of property in client list sufficiently clear-Property is ability to produce income stream from list Price must almost always be identified-Insufficient identification of price or nature of property indicated arrangement was in third class of Masters v Cameron. CORPORATIONS [105]-Directors' duties-Duty not to improperly use information gained as director-Information must be gained because of defendant's role as director. EVIDENCE [138]-Clients' status reports-Original material on which reports are based must be available if presented by non-accountant-Difficulties arising where material stored on computer. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY [112]-Confidential information-Client contact list-Ex "employee" used list to attract clients away from former "employer"-Whether information sufficiently confidential for equity to protect in absence of express or implied contractual term-Employee entitled to rely upon retained knowledge-Nature of relationship between employer and employee and instructions given to employee important-Question of fact-Client lists generally in borderline position.
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 183, 1317E, 1317H LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, ss 50, 69, 135
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate