NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cauvin v Philip Morris Limited & Ors [2005] NSWSC 640
HEARING DATE(S) : 4/4/05, 5/4/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 August 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1
DECISION : 1. The plaintiff has leave to file and serve her second amended statement of claim in conformity with these reasons within four weeks of today's date; 2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of the motion as agreed or assessed
Civil Procedure Act 2005 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Trade Practices Act 1974 LEGISLATION CITED : Trade Practices Amendment Act 1977 Trade Practices Revision Act 1986 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd [2002] FCA 243; 118 FCR 1 Bray v F Hoffman La Roche Ltd [2003] FCAFC 153; 200 ALR 607 Cauvin v Philip Morris Limited [2003] NSWSC 631 Cauvin v Philip Morris Ltd [2004] NSWSC 644 International Harvester Co of Australia Pty Ltd v Carrigan's Hazeldene Pastoral Co (1958) 100 CLR 644 Gould v National Provincial Bank [1960] Ch 337 CASES CITED : Janssen & Cilag Pty Ltd v Pfizer Pty Ltd (1992) 109 ALR 638 McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd [1999] FCA 1101165 ALR 409 March v Stramare (E & M H) Pty Ltd 50 (1991) 171 CLR 506 Qantas Airways Ltd v AF Little Pty Ltd [1981] 2 NSWLR 34 Smith, Stone & Knight Ltd v Birmingham Corporation [1939] 4 All ER 116 Wardley Australia Ltd v The State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate