NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Le [2005] NSWCCA 162
HEARING DATE(S): 12 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 12 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Wood CJ at CL at 1, 24; Grove J at 22; Hoeben J at 23
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against severity of sentence - plea of guilty - one count supply prohibited drugs on an ongoing basis - whether sentencing judge erred in the discount given for plea of guilty - strength of prosecution case - utilitarian value of plea - whether sentence manifestly excessive.
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 6(3) LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 - s 25A
House v The Queen (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v A [2004] NSWCCA 292 R v Brett [2004] NSWCCA 372 R v Johnstone [2004] NSWCCA 307 R v Kain [2004] NSWCCA 143 R v Oliver [2005] NSWCCA 6 R v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 94 CASES CITED: R v Khaled [2001] NSWCCA 169 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Radford [2002] NSWCCA 122 R v Smiroldo (2000) 112 A Crim R 47 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 45 NSWLR 383 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252
Regina PARTIES: Anh Tuan LE
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3298
P E Barrett (Crown) COUNSEL: M J Johnston
S Kavanagh SOLICITORS: S E O'Connor
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/11/0021
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Charteris DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate