NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
Nedljkovic v Orozovic [2005] NSWSC 755 CITATION : This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 26/07/2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 28 July 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Macready at 1
DECISION : Paragraph 62
CATCHWORDS : Family Provision. Application under the Family Provision Act by a partner of the deceased of 30 years. Held de facto relationship with deceased. Order for provision made.
PARTIES : Leposova Nedljkovic v Sreten Orozovic (Estate of Dusan Paripovic)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4684/2004
Mr M. Heath for plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr B. Ralston for defendant
Konstan Lawyers for plaintiff SOLICITORS : Robert D West & Associates for defendant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
- 1 - THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE MACREADY
THURSDAY 28 JULY 2005
4684/04 - LEPOSOVA NEDLJKOVIC v SRETEN OROZOVIC - ESTATE OF DUSAN PARIPOVIC
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: This is an application under the Family Provision Act in respect of the estate of the late Dusan Paripovic who died on 5 December 2003 aged sixty-eight years. He was never married and did not have children. He was survived by the plaintiff, who had lived in his house for some thirty years, and was also survived by a number of relatives. THE WILL OF THE DECEASED 2 Under the will of the deceased, the deceased appointed the defendant as executor. He was a long-time friend. The deceased gave legacies to a number of people. There was a legacy of $20,000 to Jenny Orozovic, the daughter of the defendant and the God daughter of the deceased. He gave a legacy of $20,000 to Gordana Tulum, described as a niece of the deceased. He gave the plaintiff a legacy of $25,000 and the residue he gave to his sister, Sabic Paripovic, and her daughter, Gordana Yuma. They, apparently, live in Yugoslavia. The defendant was entitled to commission of five per cent of the residue of the estate. ASSETS 3 The assets in the estate consisted of the following:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate