NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Travel Compensation Fund v John Harvey Blair & Ors [2004] NSWSC 501 revised - 15/06/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 May 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1 DECISION : See paragraphs [50] to [52] of judgment
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - Travel Agents Act 1986 (NSW) - Travel Compensation Fund - subpoena - where confidentiality claimed in respect of certain subpoenaed documents - whether certain subpoenaed documents commercially sensitive or confidential - whether certain subpoenaed documents subject to legal professional privilege - whether restricted access should be given to subpoenaed documents LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Singapore Airlines v Sydney Airports Corporation & Anor [2004] NSWSC 380 Maronis Holdings Ltd v Nippon Credit Australia Ltd (2000) 18 ACLC 609 The Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 National Employers Mutual General Association Ltd v Waind and Hill (1978) 1 NSWLR 372 CASES CITED : Wenkart and Holden v The Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (NG106 of 1995, 19/9/95, unrep) Pharaon v Bank of Credit and Commercial International SA (in liquidation) [1998] 4 All ER 455 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 29 ALR 228 Maronis; Ex parte Fielder Gillespie [1984] 2 Qd R 339 Conrock Limited v CSR Ltd (1990) 96 ALR 690 Church of Scientology of California v Department of Health and Social Security [1979] 3 All ER 97 Travel Compensation Fund (plaintiff) John Harvey Blair (defendant 1) PARTIES : George Frazis (defendant 2) Scott David Roworth (defendant 3) Gary Kenneth Toomey (defendant 4) Ansett Australia Limited (defendant 5) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55021/02; 50022/02; 50175/02; 50176/02; 50177/02; 50178/02; 50179/02; 50180/02; 50181/02; 50182/02; 50183/02 J E Marshall SC/I Mescher (plaintiff) M McConnell, Solicitor (defendants 2 and 3) COUNSEL : A Kingsford-Smith, Solicitor (defendant 4) P M Wood (for Air New Zealand) A Vincent (for ASIC) Minter Ellison (plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Colin Biggers & Paisley (defendants 2 and 3) Henry Davis York (defendant 4) Freehills (Air New Zealand)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate