NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : 789TEN v Westpac [2004] NSWSC 594 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 June 2004, 15 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1 DECISION : See paras [40] to [42] of judgment
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - abuse of process - where cross-defendants allege cross-claimant aware of information alleged as material facts in cross-claims only as result of privileged and confidential communications made for purposes of or in course of mediation - where mediation agreement contained confidentiality clause - analogy between without prejudice discussions and mediation - whether paragraphs should be struck out for abuse of process - whether conspiracy claim has no prospect of success - whether facts alleged in cross-claim show that cross-claimant has suffered damage - whether claim should be dismissed pursuant to Pt 15 r 26 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules AWA Limited v Daniels (Rolfe J, 5029 of 1991, 18/3/92, unrep) AWA v Daniels (1992) 7 ACSR 463 Lukies v Ripley (No 2) (1994) 35 NSWLR 283 CASES CITED : Williamson v Schmidt [1998] 2 Qd R 317 Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No 2) [1982] AC 173 Lonrho Plc v Fayed (No 5) [1993] 1 WLR 1489 McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd (1999) 165 ALR 409 789TEN Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Westpac Banking Corporation (First Defendant) Colin Alexander (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50167/03 M R Elliott (for 789TEN) COUNSEL : F M Douglas QC/P J Dowdy (for Westpac) M D Broun QC/A Harper (Solicitor) (for Alexander) Laurence & Laurence (for 789TEN) SOLICITORS : Henry Davis York (for Westpac) Turtons Lawyers (for Alexander)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate