NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: The Protective Commissioner v "D" & Ors (No 3) [2005] NSWCA 31
HEARING DATE(S): On written submissions
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P; Giles JA; McColl JA
DECISION: Order (2) made on 21 December 2004 amended to read "(2) Protective Commissioner to pay the second respondents' costs of the s 12 application on a comon fund basis".
CATCHWORDS: Clarification of scope of earlier costs order - no question of principle. ND
The Protective Commissioner v "D" [2004] NSWCA 216; CASES CITED: The Protective Commissioner v "D" (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 477.
The Protective Commissioner - Applicant PARTIES: "D" - First Respondent John Kotevski, Ljupka Kotevski, Nada Dimkovska and Mita Dimkovska - Second Respondents
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40892/03
S W Balafoutis - Applicant COUNSEL: No appearance - First respondent D Marks - Second respondents
Timothy John Tunbridge - Applicant SOLICITORS: No appearance - First respondent McBride Harle & Martin - Second respondents
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): ED 39/03
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Windeyer J
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40892/03 EQ 39/03
MASON P GILES JA McCOLL JA
Monday 28 February 2005 THE PROTECTIVE COMMISSIONER v "D" & ORS (NO 3) Judgment – costs application
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate