NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Phoenix Flowers P/L v Fumigate All Hours Co P/L [2005] NSWSC 615
HEARING DATE(S) : 22 June 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 June 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Harrison
DECISION : (1) The decision of the Costs Review Panel dated 25 October 2004 is affirmed; (2) The appeal is dismissed; (3) The summons filed 25 November 2004 is dismissed; (4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal determination of Costs Review Panel - indemnity for costs
LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) - s 208
Cachia v Hanes & Anor (1993-94) 179 CLR 403 Dyktynski v BHP Titanium Minerals Pty Ltd (2004) 60 NSWLR 203 Larsen v Vile [1999] NSWCA 397 CASES CITED : Murtiniti v Lyons [2004] NSWSC 135 Wentworth v Rogers [2002] NSWSC 709 Wentworth v Rogers [2004] NSWSC 1273
Phoenix Flowers Pty Limited ACN 060 531 393 (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Fumigate All Hours Co Pty Limited ACN 052 974 624 (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 13924/2004
Ms V Culkoff (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr A M Gruzman (Defendant)
Mr S Russo, Russo & Partners (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mr G Bassil, Messrs George Bassil & Associates (Defendants)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Review Panel Members C G O'Brien & D Browne
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate