NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: White Constructions (ACT) Pty Limited (In Liquidation) v White & 14 Ors [2005] NSWCA 173
HEARING DATE(S): 04/04/05, 05/04/05, 06/04/05, 07/04/05, 11/04/05, 12/04/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Santow JA at 1; Ipp JA at 2; McColl JA at 327
DECISION: (1) Appeals dismissed (2) Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeals.
CATCHWORDS: APPEALS - Challenges to factual findings made by trial judge - Principle in Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 applies - Damages - Contended on appeal that loss was suffered - Loss was of a different kind to that argued at trial - Principles relating to finality of litigation prevent damages being awarded on appeal. - EVIDENCE - Discretion to limit use made of evidence that is admitted - s 136 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - Failure to call a relevant witness - No explanation given - Rule in Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 applies. - RESTITUTION - Failure to raise it properly at trial such that no evidence there led - Appeal Court unable to determine whether restitution could be practically effected and whether it would be equitable to grant such relief. - CORPORATIONS - Breach of fiduciary duties by directors - Where fraudulent preference afforded to certain creditors - Whether damages recoverable by company itself - Company must prove it sustained financial loss. - EQUITY - Statutes of limitations - Doctrine of analogy is recognised - Breach of fiduciary duties by directors - s 48 of the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) applies by analogy. D
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Pt 5.7B, ss 565, 598(2) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 136 LEGISLATION CITED: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 80E Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 14(1)(d), 48
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate