NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 63 NSWLR 681
New South Wales Court of Appeal
A v. STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ORS.Floros v. A State of New South Wales v. A [2005] NSWCA 292 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 07/03/2005; 08/03/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Pearlman AJA at 220
DECISION: 1. That the appeal be dismissed;; 2. That the cross-appeal be allowed;; 3. That the verdict and judgment of Cooper DCJ in favour of the appellant dated 3 February 2002 be set aside;; 4. In lieu thereof enter a verdict and judgment in favour of the respondents;; 5. Set aside Order 1 made by Cooper DCJ on 19 February 2004; ; 6. That the appellant pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings at first instance, and of the appeal and cross-appeal; and; 7. That the appellant have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act 1951 (NSW) if otherwise entitled, in respect of the cross-appeal.
CATCHWORDS: TORT - malicious prosecution - reasonable and probable cause - malice - TORT - false imprisonment - unlawful detention - unlawful arrest - District Court Rules 1973 (NSW), Part 26 rr 7 and 8
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: District Court Rules 1973 (NSW)
AW & Ors v State of New South Wales [2005] NSWCA 543 Baker vTelevision & General Finance Co (Australia) Ltd [1968] 1 NSWLR 3 Bales v Parmeter (1935) 35 SR(NSW) 182 Brain v Commonwealth Life Assurance Society Ltd (1934) 35 SR(NSW) 36 Broad v Ham (1839) 5 Bing NC 722 Brown v Hawkes (1891) 2 QB 718 BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 Commonwealth Life Assurance Society Ltd v Brain (1935) 53 CLR 343 Dallison v Caffery [1965] 1 QB 348 Dawson v vansandau (1863) 11 WR 516 Glinski v McIver [1962] AC 726 Grainger v Hill (1838) 4 Bing (N.C.) 212 Haddrick v Heslop (1848) 12 QB 267 Herniman v Smith [1938] AC 305 Hicks v Faulkner (1878) 8 QB 167 Hobbs v Tinling (CT) & Co Ltd; Hobbs v Nottingham Journal Ltd [1929] 2 KB 1 Houston v Stone (1943) 43 SR(NSW) 118 CASES CITED: Krivoshev & Anor v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc & Ors [2005] NSWCA 76 McDoanld v Coles Myer Ltd (t/a K-Mart Chatswood) (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-361 Mitchell v John Heine & Son Ltd (1938) 38 SR(NSW) 466 Nye v State of New South Wales (2004) Aust Torts Reports 81-725 Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 R v Dann [2000] NSWCCA 185 R v RTB [2002] NSWCCA 104 R v Skaf & Ors [2004] NSWCCA 84 Sharp v Biggs (1932) 48 CLR 81 Stevens v Midland Counties Railways (1854) 10 Exch 352 Tempest v Snowden [1952] 1 KB 130 Thacker v Crown Prosecution Service [1997] EWCA Civ 3000 Thompson v Vincent [2005] NSWCA 219 Trobridge v Hardy (1955) 94 CLR 147 Varawa v Howard Smith Co Limited (1911) 13 CLR 35 Van Der Lee & Ors v State of New South Wales & Ors [2002] NSWCA 286 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate