NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) NSW ConvR 56-126
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Crowe v Rindock Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 375
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 and 31 March 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 April 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Judgment for the plaintiff for return of deposit
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY - vendor and purchaser - requisitions on title - vendor makes inadequate reponse - notice to complete sent minutes after amended response - whether vendor in breach and whether purchaser in default
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s149 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, Reg 279 LEGISLATION CITED : Mines Subsidence Compensation Act 1961 s16 Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 s83
Butt Standard Contract for Sale of Land in NSW 2nd Edition [545] Festa Holdings Pty Limited v Adderton [2004] NSWCA 288 Godfrey Constructions Pty Ltd v Kanangra Park Pty Limited (1972) 128 CLR 529 Green v Seven (1879) 13 ChD 589 In Re Solomon & Davey (1879) 10 ChD 366 CASES CITED : McIntryre v Marshall [2004] NSWSC 412 Neeta (Epping) Pty Limited v Phillips (1974) 131 CLR 286 P W Watts The Law Relating to Requisition 5 ALJ 10 and 50 Re Ford & Hill (1879) 10 ChD 365 Stonham The Law of Vendor & Purchaser 1966 [1011] Winchcombe Carson Trustee Company v Ball-Rand Pty Ltd [1974] 1 NSWLR 477
Debra Pauline Crowe (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Rindock Pty Limited (First Defendant) Karin Schultz (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate