NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: STATE TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES v CHEMLER [2006] NSWCA 249
HEARING DATE(S): 28 August 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 September 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; McColl JA at 26
DECISION: Appeal allowed with costs; see orders at [25].
CATCHWORDS: WORKERS COMPENSATION - Psychological injury –whether any psychological injury suffered by respondent wholly or predominantly caused by disciplinary action taken by appellant – nature of reasons giving rise to error in point of law.
LEGISLATION CITED: Workers Compensation Act 1987 s9A(1), s11A(1) Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 s353
CASES CITED: Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139
PARTIES: STATE TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES (Appellant) Fritz CHEMLER (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40719/05
COUNSEL: G WATSON, SC/ D SANT (Appellant) S GORMLEY, SC/ B McMANAMEY (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Sparke Helmore (Appellant) Turner Freeman (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Workers Compensation Commission
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): WCC509-04
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Acting Deputy President Robin Handley
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 10 August 2005
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2005] NSW WCC PD 82
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40719/05 WCC 509/04
HANDLEY JA SANTOW JA McCOLL JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate