NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Romano [2005] NSWCCA 313
HEARING DATE(S): 31 August 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Smart AJ at 47; Patten AJ at 48
DECISION: leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: appeal against severity of sentence - plea of guilty to charge of intimidation - plea of guilty to charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, committed in company - aggravating factors of offences - accumulation of sentences - custodial circumstances - no error shown
Crimes Act 1900 s59(2), s562AB LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Part 3 Division 3 s21A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s6
R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; 118 A Crim R 66 R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 76 R v Romano [2004] NSWCCA 380 CASES CITED: R v Shankley [2003] NSWCCA 253 R v Walker [2005] NSWCCA 109 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465
Crown - Respondent PARTIES: Adrian Russell Romano - Applicant
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/988
W Dawe QC - Crown COUNSEL: AP Cook - Applicant
S Kavanagh - Crown SOLICITORS: SE O'Connor - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/21/0131
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Twigg DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/988
SIMPSON J SMART AJ PATTEN AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate