NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Christakos Transport Pty Ltd (in liq) v Croft [2005] NSWCA 472
HEARING DATE(S): 22/08/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Santow JA at 1; McColl JA at 2; Campbell AJA at 3
DECISION: 1. Extend time for filing and serving of ordinary summons for leave to appeal until date of filing and serving of ordinary summons for leave to appeal filed herein; 2. Leave to appeal granted; 3. Notice of appeal to be filed within seven days; 4. Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: Limitation of Actions - Application for extension of time - Limitation Act, s 60C - Onus of proof - Application of Limitation Act, s 60E - Costs - Whether trial judge erred in advising that each party pay own costs.
LEGISLATION CITED: Limitation Act 1969
The Sydney City Council v Zegarac (1998) 43 NSWLR 195 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 McLean v Sydney Water Corporation (2001) NSWCA 122 Maviglia v Maviglia [1999] NSWCA 188 Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 CASES CITED: Commonwealth v McLean (1996) 41 NSWLR 389 South Western Sydney Area Health Service v Gabriel [2001] NSWCA 477 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Gorczynski v Perera [2004] NSWCA 71 Wentworth v Rogers (No 3) (1986) 6 NSWLR 642 Will of F B Gilbert (Deceased) (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318
Christakos Transport Pty Ltd - Claimant PARTIES: Lance Croft - Opponent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate