NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Susan Elizabeth Taylor v Dexta Corporation Ltd & Ors [2005] NSWSC 974
HEARING DATE(S) : 27.06.05, 28.06.05, 29.06.05
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 September 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Nicholas J
DECISION : para 66
CATCHWORDS : INSURANCE - home warranty insurance policy - construction - whether building contract entered into during policy period - whether building owner entitled to indemnity - CONTRACT - rectification of insurance policy - whether common intention established - PROCEDURE - application for judgment under Pt 18, r 3 on defendants' admissions - whether plaintiff entitled to judgment
LEGISLATION CITED : Home Building Act 1989 s 99(1), s 92(1), s 102, s 103B
Brunker v Perpetual Trustee (1937) 59 CLR 140 Damberg v Damberg & Ors [2001] NSWCA 87 Gramophone Company Ltd v Magazine Holder Co (1911) 28 RPC 221 McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd (2000) 203 CLR 579 CASES CITED : Muriti v Prendergast [2005] NSWSC 281 Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Termijtelen v van Arkel & Anor (1974) 1 NSWLR 525 Wilkie v Gordian Runoff Ltd [2005] HCA 17
Susan Elizabeth Taylor - plaintiff Dexta Corporation Ltd - first defendant PARTIES : Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd - second defendant BP Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation) - third defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55011/05
Janet Oakley - plaintiff Cameron Burge - first and second defendant COUNSEL :
Pricewaterhousecoopers Legal - plaintiff SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt - first and second defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate