NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Fair Trading Administration Corp v Woods & Ors [2005] NSWSC 1294
HEARING DATE(S) : 6 December 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 December 2005
Common Law Division, JURISDICTION : Administration Law List
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Harrison
DECISION : (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) The decision of Senior Member Phillipps dated 24 February 2005 is affirmed; (3) The summons filed 9 March 2005 is dimissed; (4) The plaintiff is to pay the first defendants' costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Leave to appeal decision of CTTT - indemnity costs
Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 (NSW) - ss 53 & 67 LEGISLATION CITED : Home Building Regulation 1990 (NSW)
Building Insurers' Guarantee Corporation v CTTT & Ors [2005] NSWSC 503 Chapman v Taylor & Ors; Vero Insurance Ltd v Taylor & Ors [2004] NSWCA 456 Colgate-Palmolive v Cussons Pty Limited; Cussons Pty Limited v Colgate-Palmolive Company and Colgate-Palmolive Pty Limited No NG594 of 1989 FED No 801/93 Costs (1993) 46 FCR 225 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED : Kalokerinos & Anor v HIA Insurance Services P/L & Anor [2004] NSWCA 312 MKIC v OCBC [2004] VSC 351 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Woods & Wilson v Fair Trading Administration Corporation (Home Building) [2004] NSWCTTT 523 (25 May 2004)
Fair Trading Administration Corporation (Plaintiff)
Stephen J Woods & Kerrie B Wilson PARTIES : (First Defendants)
CTTT (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate