NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Romano v Romano; Estate of Giacomo Romano [2004] NSWSC 775 HEARING DATE(S) : 13/08/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 August 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Order for separate determination of question. Order for interim distribution.
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION - executors and administrators - administration - application for interim distribution - estate not fully administered - assets nevertheless clearly sufficient to allow payment of pecuniary legacy LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules, Part 31, Part 68 rule 2(3)(d) or (4)(b) Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898, ss.29, 84 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 Barns v Barns (2003) 214 CLR 169 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland) v Livingston [1965] AC 694 Gonzales v Claridades (2003) 58 NSWLR 211 CASES CITED : In the will of Clinton (1910) 10 SR (NSW) 465 Official Receiver in Bankruptcy v Schultz (1990) 170 CLR 306 Re Anderson (1953) 53 SR(NSW) 520 Romano v Romano [2003] NSWSC 436 Romano v Romano [2004] NSWCA 37 Stokes v Churchill; Estate of Fryer (unreported, NSWSC, Santow J, 16 December 1993) PARTIES : Louise Romano - Plaintiff Edward Romano - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3450/04 COUNSEL : Mr L J Ellison - Plaintiff Mr J R Wilson SC - Defendant SOLICITORS : John Fisicaro & Co - Plaintiff Michie, Shehadie & Co - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate