NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Notter v Girault [2004] NSWSC 863 HEARING DATE(S) : 08/09/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : White J DECISION : 1. Dismiss the Amended Summons; 2. Dissolve the injunction granted on 25 June 2004; 3. Direct that if the defendant wishes an enquiry as to damages pursuant to the plaintiff's undertaking as to damages given on 25 June 2004, the defendant file and serve a notice of motion and affidavit in support thereof within 28 days; 4. Refer the proceedings to a Master to enquire as to damages, if such notice of motion is filed; 5. The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs; 6. Exhibits to be returned after 28 days.
CATCHWORDS : Contract - Sale of land - Forfeited deposit - Whether there was a revival of previous contract - Authority of licensed conveyancer to enter into a new contract for the vendor - Whether there were acts of part performance by purchaser - Claim for repayment of forfeited deposit. LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) ss 54A, 55(2A) Cameron v McGrath (1996) 40 NSWLR 39 Ashington Piggeries Limited v Christopher Hill Limited [1972] AC 441 Pianta v National Finance and Trustees Ltd (1964) 180 CLR 146 CASES CITED : Strangas v Young (1975) 1 BPR 9123 Tweddell v Henderson [1975] 2 All ER 1096 Khouri v Khoury [2004] NSWSC 770 Walton Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 Francis v Francis [1952] VLR 321 Ruth Claudia Notter PARTIES : v Patricia Suzanne Maryline Girault FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3635/04 COUNSEL : Plaintiff: W J Carney Defendant: G M McGrath SOLICITORS : Plaintiff: Carneys Lawyers Defendant: Hannaford Cox Connellan & McFarland
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate