NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) NSW ConvR 56-155
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Callaghan v Merivale CBD Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 985
HEARING DATE(S) : 08/08/05-11/08/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 20 October 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Burchett AJ
DECISION : Verdict for plaintiff in the action and for the cross-claimant on cross-claim.
CATCHWORDS : Lease - rent review clauses - whether time of essence in any respect - payment of rent demanded which substantially exceeded rent due - mistake as to legal obligation - mistake induced by lessor's representation about obligation - inference from intention to induce belief that belief was induced - meaning of "anniversary" - construction contrary to ordinary meaning of word to avoid absurdity - power of court to mould language - principles of interpretation - rule as to construction of rent review clauses - indications to contrary of prima facie rule - effect of lenity in one respect and strictness in an other as an indication the strict construction must be adhered to where it is applicable - effect of lessor itself failing to comply with a time requirement - consideration of waiver as estoppel or as election - implied agreement - equitable assignment where assignor ASIC on behalf of defunct company not joined - effect - nature of renewal of a lease - effect of covenant to repair in short form under Schedule 4 of the Conveyancing Act - effect of words "having regard to the condition of the demised premises at the commencement of the lease " - meaning of covenant to replace a worn out item with one "of a like nature and equal value"
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)
Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Como Investments Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Yenald Nominees Pty Ltd (1997) ATPR 43 Kiriri Cotton Co Ltd v Dewani [1960] AC 192 David Securities Pty Limited v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Peking Palace Ltd (Tang's Restaurant) v Trizec Construction Limited (1987) 20 BCLR (2d) 161 Duchow v New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund (1982) 691 F 2d 74 Save Our Suburbs (SOS) NSW Incorporated v Electoral Commissioner of New South Wales (2002) 55 NSWLR 642 Short v F W Hercus Pty Limited (1993) 40 FCR 511 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420 Dockside Holdings Pty Ltd v Rakio Pty Ltd (2001) 79 SASR 374 Westpac Banking Corporation v Tanzone Pty Ltd (2000) 9 BPR 17521 Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749 Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896 United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council [1978] AC 904 Gollin & Company Limited v Karenlee Nominees Proprietary Limited (1983) 153 CLR 455 G R Mailman & Associates Pty Ltd v Wormald (Aust) Pty Ltd (1991) 24 NSWLR 80 Mecca Leisure Ltd v Renown Investments (Holdings) Ltd (1984) 49 P&CR 12 Mobil Oil New Zealand Ltd v Mandeno [1995] 3 NZLR 114 W & R Jack Ltd v Fifield [2000] 3 NZLR 129 CASES CITED : Perri v Coolangatta Investments Proprietary Limited (1982) 149 CLR 537 Charles Rickards Ld v Oppenheim [1950] 1 KB 616 Craine v The Colonial Mutual Fire Insurance Company Limited (1926) 28 CLR 305 George v Roach (1942) 67 CLR 253 Deaves v CML Fire and General Insurance Company Limited (1979) 143 CLR 24 Johnson v Agnew [1980] AC 367 Empirnall Holdings Pty Ltd v Machon Paull Partners Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 523 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 33 Bank Street Nominees Pty Ltd v Citipower Pty (1997) BC 9702794 Solle v Butcher [1950] 1 KB 671 David Securities Pty Limited v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Commissioner of State Revenue (Victoria) v Royal Insurance Australia Limited (1994) 182 CLR 51 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Limited (2001) 208 CLR 516 British American Tobacco Australia Ltd v The State of Western Australia (2003) 217 CLR 30 Weddell v Pearce [1988] 1 Ch 26 Jennings v Credit Corp Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 48 NSWLR 709 Gerraty v McGavin (1914) 18 CLR 152 Lurcott v Wakely & Wheeler [1911] 1 KB 905 Commonwealth of Australia v Amann Aviation Pty Limited (1991) 174 CLR 64 Amann Aviation Pty Limited v Commonwealth of Australia (1990) 22 FCR 527
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate