NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Desmond Henry Randall v Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ACN 002 818 368) [2004] NSWSC 599 HEARING DATE(S) : 5/07/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 July 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Orders as to relocation expenses. Plaintiff to pay 10 percent of defendant's costs of the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : Costs - Principles - Construction - Relocation - Expenses LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules (NSW) Bond Corporation Holdings Limited, Re (1990) 1 ACSR 350 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 Donald Campbell & Co Ltd v Pollak [1927] AC 732 CASES CITED : Fexuto Pty Limited v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Limited (No 3) 30 ACSR 20, NSWSC, 26/11/98 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Limited v International Produce Merchants Limited (1988) 81 ALR 397 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Waters v P C Henderson (Australia) Pty Ltd, unreported, NSWCA, 6 July 1994, BC9404952 PARTIES : Desmond Henry Randall (Plaintiff) Aristocrat Leisure Limited (ACN 002 818 368) (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50066/03 COUNSEL : Mr B Coles QC, Mr A Fernon (Plaintiff) Mr G Lindsay SC, Mr A McGrath (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Toomey Pegg Drevikovsky (Plaintiff) Phillips Fox (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate