NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Prendergast v DaimlerChrysler [2005] NSWSC 131
HEARING DATE(S) : 22/12/04
JUDGMENT DATE : 23 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : See paras 114-117.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - s 237 - Leave to bring under section. - INJUNCTIONS - Heads of Agreement - Notice of termination - Whether serious question to be tried - When compromise of a claim is sufficient consideration - Whether arguable that the court has jurisdiction to grant relief against forfeiture of rights under dealership agreement - Where time stipulations essential.
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Wigan v Edwards (1973) 1 ALR 497 Carter & Harland "Contract Law in Australia" 4th ed, paragraph 352 Scandinavian Trading Co v Flota Petrolera Ecuatoriana (1983) 2 AC 694 Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding (1973) AC 691 Makucha Developments Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1993) 115 ALR 679 CASES CITED : Chaka Holdings Pty Ltd v Sunsim Pty Ltd (1987) NSW Conv R 55-367 Sigma Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd v NUC-1 Enterprises Pty Ltd (1998) VSC 204 Liristis Holdings Pty Ltd v Wallville Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 428 Hewitt v Debus (2004) 59 NSWLR 617 Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489
John Francis Prendergast PARTIES : v DaimlerChrysler Australia Pacific Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6889/04
Plaintiff: CRC Newlinds SC, P Newton COUNSEL : Defendant: BR McClintock SC, L Gyles
Plaintiff: Phillips Fox SOLICITORS : Defendant: Robinson Legal
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate